Take-up at the Federal Reserve’s Overnight Reverse Repo Facility (ON RRP) increased from a few billion dollars in January 2021 to around $2.6 trillion at the end of December 2022. In this post, based on a recent Staff Report, we explain how the supply of U.S. Treasury bills (T-bills) affects the decision of money market mutual funds (MMFs) to invest at the facility. We show that MMFs responded to a reduction in T-bill supply by increasing their take-up at the ON RRP, helping to explain the increased overall take-up.
MMFs’ Demand for U.S. Treasury Securities
U.S. MMFs are open-end mutual funds regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that can only invest in safe and highly liquid money-market instruments denominated in U.S. dollars. Among such instruments, U.S. Treasury securities are especially relevant because of their safety and liquidity. Since MMFs cannot hold securities with a remaining maturity greater than 397 days, T-bills are an especially appealing investment option for them. MMFs’ demand for Treasury securities, moreover, has grown significantly since October 2016, when the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) implemented an important reform of the MMF industry; this reform led to an increase in assets under management of more than $1 trillion for government MMFs—a type of MMF that can only hold Treasury securities, agency debt, or repurchase agreements collateralized by these assets.
Treasury Supply Decreases after the COVID-19 Crisis Subdues
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Treasury expanded its debt issuance, and in particular its issuance of T-bills, which accounted for 83 percent of the newly issued marketable government debt between March and September 2020. As the chart below shows, T-bills outstanding increased from $2.66 trillion to $5.03 trillion during this period. As economic conditions improved, the issuance of T-bills returned to levels closer to historical standards, and T-bills outstanding decreased from $4.95 trillion to $3.51 trillion between January 2021 and July 2022.
T-bills Outstanding Decreased from January 2021 to July 2022
Take-up at the ON RRP Increases as T-Bills Become Scarce
One of the drivers of the increase in ON RRP take-up may have been the relative shortage of T-bills, which limited MMFs’ investment options, making investment at the ON RRP an attractive alternative. As we discussed in a previous post, the MMF industry grew substantially between 2016 and 2020, expanding from $2.99 trillion in January 2019 to $4.22 trillion in December 2020, partly as a result of monetary policy tightening; moreover, much of this increase was concentrated in government MMFs, which experienced large inflows during the early stages of the COVID crisis. The resulting increase in the demand for safe assets from MMFs, and especially from government MMFs, may have led MMFs to turn to the ON RRP facility as the supply of available T-bills became scarce.
To identify the effect of T-bill supply on ON RRP take-up, we exploit the differential exposure to variation in T-bill supply across MMFs. Government MMFs are more exposed to shocks in the T-bill supply than prime MMFs, which can also lend to financial and nonfinancial corporations through unsecured debt instruments such as certificates of deposit and commercial paper. As a result, the ON RRP investment of government MMFs should be more sensitive to a decrease in T-bill issuance than that of prime MMFs.
To test our conjecture, we run a regression analysis of ON RRP investment on a daily panel of MMFs eligible to invest in the ON RRP, from April 2020 to August 2022, during the expansion and subsequent contraction of T-bill issuance. Our regressions identify the effect of T-bill issuance on the share of ON RRP investment in government-MMF portfolios relative to prime-MMF portfolios, controlling both for unobserved time-invariant fund characteristics and for time-varying common factors.
We find that a decrease in monthly T-bill issuance of $100 billion leads government MMFs to increase the share of their portfolios invested at the ON RRP by roughly 2.34 percentage points more than prime MMFs. The estimate is highly significant, suggesting a causal relationship between T-bill supply and ON RRP investment. The effect is also economically important: government MMFs eligible to invest at the ON RRP had, on average, $3.3 trillion in assets under management between April 2020 and August 2022; considering that T-bill issuance declined by almost $1 trillion during the same period, their ON RRP investment increased by $750 billion relative to that of prime MMFs, against a total increase in ON RRP take-up of $2.3 trillion.
A shortage of T-bills reduces MMFs’ investment options, pushing them to increase their investment at the ON RRP facility. This happened in 2021 and 2022, when the Treasury significantly reduced its issuance of bills; considering that T-bill issuance declined by almost $1 trillion during the same period, its effect on the portfolio composition of government MMFs relative to that of prime MMFs corresponds to an additional increase in ON RRP investment by roughly $750 billion, against a total increase in ON RRP take-up of $2.2 trillion.
Gara Afonso is the head of Banking Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.
Marco Cipriani is the head of Money and Payments Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.
Catherine Huang is a Ph.D. student in business economics at Harvard University.
Gabriele La Spada is a financial research economist in Money and Payments Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.
Sergio Olivas is a research analyst in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.
How to cite this post:
Gara Afonso, Marco Cipriani, Catherine Huang, Gabriele La Spada, and Sergio Olivas, “Treasury Bill Supply and ON RRP Investment,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, November 29, 2023, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2023/11/treasury-bill-supply-and-on-rrp-investment/.
The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).